The hidden curriculum is a side-effect of the formal
curriculum and is sometimes called the “unofficial curriculum”. In school
learners may learn unintended values, beliefs, behaviours and norms in the
classroom and the social learning environment (Gordon, Bridglall & Meroe,
2005; Kentli, 2009). What they learn can include lessons on how to interact in
conversations with others; behave; debate and discuss their points of views;
use power and authority and compete. These lessons can be either negative or
positive in terms of encouraging literate and well-equipped citizens.
You get three types of hidden curriculums namely: Hidden
micro-curriculum, Hidden meso-curriculum and Hidden macro- curriculum. Below
I’ve explain the definitions of the micro-curriculum and Chalufu definition of
the three hidden curriculums:
The hidden
micro-curriculum is the relationship between teacher and learners:
In the class learners learn from the hidden curriculum
to:
Wait quietly for the teacher to start with the lesson;
Exercise restraint; Complete an activity; Keep busy; Cooperate; Show loyalty to
both teaches and peers, and
be near and punctual (Jackson, 1968) This hidden
curriculum can either be negative or positive
Chalufu ( 1996: 96 -97) identifies three categories of the hidden
curriculum:
The hidden micro-curriculum which manifests itself in each lesson mostly
through the relationships and interactions of the teacher and each pupil as
well as interaction between pupils themselves.
• The hidden meso-curriculum which refers to experiences which pupils and
teachers undergo within a particular school and its immediate environment but
outside individual lessons.
The most common meso-realities
which affect the teaching-learning dynamics in a school are:
• the teachers' personalities and
relationships with another;
• the pupils' personalities and
relationships across class barriers; the influence of parents and community
leaders; the nature of the surrounding communities; and extra-curricular
activities
• The hidden macro-curriculum manifests itself at a national level
through predominant national forces. The government is the major factor here as
its economic control of the education system is to achieve certain political
goals.
The implications that the hidden curriculum have on South Africa
education system; concern raised and factors contribute to the concern
The curriculum is the guideline and should ask few key
questions to identify the crisis facing the SA education system. For instance,
1)
What type
of curriculum is followed in a school? 2)
To what extent does it address the needs of learners? 3) Does it matter which school a learner goes to?
Curriculum key questions are not only normative; they are analytical as
well, covering a broad range of issues such as;
·
What is
the nature of the school knowledge? What should be taught in schools? How
should be taught? Why should it be taught? Who should be taught? Who should
teach the learner? When and where should the learner be taught?
The above key questions form the dominant themes in the analysis of
curriculum issues.
Most schools in South Africa have
been affected by the hidden
macro-curriculum, reflected in:
Resources which are grossly inadequate.
·
In 2013
schools from Limpopo
registered their concerns regarding the shortage of textbooks were dumped in
Giyani and in March 2014 the DBE was taken to court for failing to distribute books to schools in time. (The
Star, 9 March).
·
The
question remains, will it be possible for learners to pass their examinations
with flying colours without textbooks?
·
In many
secondary school classrooms, in rural areas of the Eastern Cape, Limpopo,
Mpumalanga and the North West provinces, some of the schools are still having
roofs which leak; learners sit on the bare floor, to receive instruction from
teachers who also have no furniture to sit on.
·
Dilapidated
buildings with outdated laboratories and libraries. 20 years into democracy
some of the school is, in our so called the New SA, especially in rural areas,
are not in an immaculate condition.
·
Seven
schools in the Eastern Cape's poverty-stricken OR Tambo district, near Mthatha,
took the national, provincial and local governments to court, over their
failure to provide adequate resources, arguing their right to basic education
has been violated. The instructional material readily available in some rural
secondary schools is the chalkboard, and in many schools, the teachers
themselves provide the chalk for classroom use.
·
Vandalism
and arson by students which results in destroying school buildings
·
Poor
wages for teachers which result in low morale.
·
Curriculum
changes without timing; from Curriculum 2005, Outcomes-Based Education,
National Curriculum Statement, and Revised National Curriculum Statement to
Curriculum Assessment Policy Statements (CAPS). All these curricula are
implemented without an intensive training for teachers. Training was done in
haphazard ways perhaps more vital, was the growing sensitivity towards how the
school curriculum is organised and made to be responsive in the implementation
process.
Perhaps more vital, was the
growing sensitivity towards how the school curriculum is organised and made to
be responsive in the implementation process.
Impact of the hidden-micro
curriculum
The way that schools and teachers choose to educate students can convey
both intentional and unintended messages. Research shows that SA education
system have failed to that. The poor performance of South Africa Schools
compared to those in both developed and developing countries has been
established at primary level in mathematics and reading (Moloi and Strauss,
2005;Howie et al, 200) and at secondary level in mathematics and science
(Howie, 2001; Reddy, 2006, see also Taylor et al, 2007) e of the most
interesting cross national studies; was the research conducted by the
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement
(IEA),which gathered empirical data on educational achievement from 33
countries, including South Africa in the fields of Business, Mathematics and
Science. Although most Grade 12 learners obtained a bachelor, of the 22 645 who
sat for the NSCE in 2012, only 14.2% passed with flying colours. These students
qualified to register for medicine, engineering and accounting fields. In 2013,
only 16,4% made a credit pass which would enable them to register for the scare
skills areas.
No comments:
Post a Comment